Digi - Legal Insights

Unauthorized shops constructed on open layout space cannot be regularized; delay in demolition despite court orders undermines rule of law.

Review not maintainable where Supreme Court has declared predecessors transactions void and barred further challenge.

Plaint filed without a genuine cause of action, lacking relevancy for suit and barred by limitation is liable to be rejected under Order VII Rule 11.

Omission of material facts and absence of specific pleadings of corrupt practice in election petition justify its rejection under O. VII R. 11 CPC and Ss. 83 & 87 of the Representation of the People Act.

Application for overtime wages is maintainable where entitlement is undisputed and amount is computable in terms of money.

Partnership does not confer proprietary right in license; renewal can be sought only by the original licensee.

Interest and statutory benefits cannot be granted from date of possession prior to Section 4 notification; Reference Courts award partly modified.2016 S.C.C. OnLine.Bom. 2236, ref.

Petition dismissed as petitioner failed to come with clean hands and made unsupported allegations about planning report.

Repeatedly rejected claim of protected tenancy cannot be revived; fraudulently obtained orders confer no rights

Dispute before Co-operative Court not maintainable due to SARFAESI action and non-joinder of bank as necessary party.

Petitioner held entitled to parity of wages where contract workers performed same work as regular employees; failure of employer to disprove claim.

Insurance policy terms strictly construed; claim for death of Secu rity Guard rejected as policy only covered cleaners/supervisors.

Compensation enhanced after recalculation of salary, future pros pects, and dependency; insurer and employer held jointly liable

Notional income, future prospects, and non-pecuniary losses must be appropriately accounted for in calculating compensation.

Courts below rightly treated transaction as mortgage by conditional sale and alternate plea of specific performance was unjustified.

MACT award for death claim modified; insurance companys liability restricted to policy terms; interest awarded at 8% p.a.

Compensation modified to 60% per sq. ft. with 20% deduction towards development charges following parity with coordinate bench decision.

Workers of NEERI entitled to equal pay for equal work as per Rule 25(2)(v)(a) CLRA Rules and based on factual findings.

Compensation to be calculated on basis of deceaseds latest ITRs and age based deduction; insurer and owner jointly liable.

Evidence shows that accident was occurred due to negligence of Bus Driver-Bus Driver was examined by Appellant, so non-impleadment of Bus Drivers testimony has no merit.