CIDCO cannot cancel auction process in respect of Plot No. 25 even after approval of its Board resolution by State Government.
Tenancy becomes
terminable through a notice under the Transfer of Property Act once protection
under the Rent Control Act is lost.
No valid grounds to challenge Award under Section 34 of Act, as Arbitrators interpretations were deemed reasonable and consistent with established law.
Harassment of a mother
by her son and daughter-in-law nullifies compassionate claims; eviction upheld.
Pre-constitutional
records supporting a caste claim have greater probative value and should be
given due weight.
Restoration of protection under the Rent Control Act is not permissible if lost due to the entitys financial capability, as evidenced by paid-up capital and reserves.
Civil Courts cannot
entertain suits where the cause of action arises solely from apprehensions
without legal substantiation.
A company that loses
tenancy protection under the Rent Control Act cannot regain it by later
reducing its capital below the statutory limit.
Municipal corporations cannot justify illegal regularization of unauthorized construction through misleading legal references.
Orders granting trust status to a property without due procedure are invalid.
Suspension of
registration under pre-existing schemes due to electoral conduct rules is
invalid.
Applications for
recording additional evidence must demonstrate relevance and necessity to the
case at hand.
Liability primarily
rests on the individual as defined under municipal laws; excess tax must be
refunded with interest or adjusted against other dues.
Legal representatives
cannot introduce additional evidence at the final hearing unless justified
under Order XXII Rule 4(2) CPC.
A person not party to the suit or without legal representative status cannot object to execution of a decree under Section 47 CPC.
Settlement with one
respondent does not absolve others unless terms of the compromise clearly state
so.
In motor accident
cases, liability is determined by police evidence and facts, with maintenance
deductions adjusted for earnings.
Once caste validity is issued, social status is
conclusively established, and technical discrepancies cannot be a ground for
rejection.
Failure to pass an
award within the stipulated time under the Land Acquisition Act results in
lapsing of acquisition.
Inordinate delay in
pursuing relief and speculative motives under the 2013 Act cannot justify
interference with acquisition under Article 226.
Tap the button below to open the PDF in your device's default viewer