Even it is a case of only broken relationship, which by itself would not amount to abetment of suicide hence accused, is acquitted of offence for which he was charged, convicted, and sentenced.
Complainants evidence was insufficient to establish that cheque was issued for a legal and enforceable liability and no legal debt existed between complainant and accused, leading to acquittal of accused without any legal error.
Appellate Courts discretion to require deposit was deemed valid to deter delays and uphold rights of complainant, who has been engaged in litigation since November 2022 hence, order of Appellate Court needs to be upheld.
As There Are Insufficient Grounds To Charge Accused With Alleged Offences, Impugned Judgment Of Conviction Set Aside And Accused Is Acquitted Of Said Offence.
Conviction upheld as
prosecution proved that the accused assaulted the victim with intent to outrage
her modesty.
Show-cause notice and externment order did not adequately consider Petitioners bail conditions or provide specific threats from witnesses, rendering externment action unjustified.
Grounds of arrest
communicated within four minutes, no violation of fundamental rights.
Impugned order of detention set aside, as Petitioners detention does not fulfill legal preconditions and constitutional safeguards.
Conviction upheld as
overtaking from the left side resulted in fatalities, violating road safety
regulations.
Conviction set aside
due to weak circumstantial evidence and absence of a reliable extra-judicial
confession.
Impugned orders are not lengthy orders, but reasons assigned for rejecting proposals cannot be faulted.
Circumstantial evidence
was insufficient to sustain a conviction; death sentence reversed.
Respondent, who has served Petitioner for over 8 years and completed 240 days, is entitled to notice before retrenchment and compensation.
If qualifying service is complete, pension cannot be denied on premise that employee was working as an Untrained Teacher.
Court monitoring of an
investigation is unnecessary once trial has commenced.
Appeals in PMLA matters
should be filed on criminal side due to penal nature of proceedings.
Excess payment has been made to Petitioner for period in excess of five years before order of recovery made thus, Respondent no.4-Deputy Chief Executive Officer directed to repay amount of Rs.1,35,518/- to Petitioner.
Gross delay in action
by Drug Inspector vitiates prosecutions case.
Magistrate empowered to
issue process even against persons not named in charge-sheet if material exists.
Neither police nor
criminal court has authority to impound a passport under Sections 102 or 104 of
CrPC.
Tap the button below to open the PDF in your device's default viewer