Stand of Respondents that Petitioners illness affects the establishments efficiency and they should terminate his services, however, such a stand of Respondents cannot be countenanced as same is in teeth of provisions of Section 20 (1)(4) of Act.
Disputes involved in Suit cannot be referred to Arbitration on account of disputes relating to redemption of mortgage being incapable of resolving through arbitration on account of absence of arbitration clause.
Article 30 of Constitution grants the State the right to appoint teachers, subject to eligibility conditions, but this right cannot be diluted by State insisting on appointment by Board of Directors.
Retired government employee is not entitled to receive gratuity until payment of penal rent.
None of documents support plea of protection of possession as contemplated under Section 53-A of TP Act thus, no reason to take a different view from view expressed by Appeal Court.
Respondents single option was unjustified and violated Disabilities Act, 2016 hence, Respondent directed to recommend Petitioner against any vacant posts in selection process for visually impaired candidates.
Allegations under Sections 498A, 506
IPC found to be vague and motivated by family discord; proceedings quashed to
prevent abuse of process.
FIR and charge-sheet
quashed where no prima facie offence under Sections 294, 504, 506 IPC is made
out and prior sanction was not obtained.
FIR under Sections
498A, 377 IPC and Dowry Act quashed where parties voluntarily settled
matrimonial dispute and informant supported quashing-Exercise of inherent
powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. justified.
Application under
Section 482 CrPC dismissed where applicants, despite undertaking, attempted
forcible possession, justifying Magistrates direction to maintain status quo to
prevent breach of peace.
Transfer to open prison
rightly denied where Selection Committee found prisoner ineligible under Rules
4(II)(d) and (n); no violation of natural justice.
Detention order quashed
where Detaining Authority failed to show subjective satisfaction and relied on
stale offences and unverified confidential statements; no material to establish
disturbance to public order.
Detention order quashed
where stale offences since 2021 and absence of recent C.A. reports fail to
establish disturbance to public order; identical witness statements held
insufficient.
Detention order
vitiated due to non-supply of medical experts opinion on C.A. reports;
violation of Article 22(5) of Constitution.
Detention under MPDA
Act quashed where material shows only law and order issue and lacks grounds to
classify detenu as dangerous person or bootlegger.
Detention under MPDA
Act set aside where material discloses only law and order issue and not
disturbance to public order.
Though Advisory Board
had approved detention of Petitioner, there was no material before detaining
authority to categorize Petitioner as a dangerous person or bootlegger,
detention order set aside.
Though Advisory Board
had approved detention of Petitioner, yet there was no material before
Detaining Authority to categorize Petitioner as a dangerous person or
bootlegger, detention order set aside.
Though petitioner is
detained as a bootlegger for recent offences about bootlegging but detaining
authority considered stale offences and unverified confidential statements,
Detention order under MPDA held vitiated.
Illegal gratification
not proved-Conviction set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand of
illegal gratification; benefit of doubt extended to accused.
Tap the button below to open the PDF in your device's default viewer