Relief under Sec. 19
denied-Under-construction flat not in possession of either party does not
qualify as shared household.
Where prima facie material
exists under IPC Sections 120B and 420 read with PC Act, 1988, rejection of
discharge application under Section 227 CrPC is proper.
Rejection of discharge
application under Section 227 CrPC upheld where sufficient material existed and
investigation was valid under Section 17(c) of PC Act.
Accused discharged
under Sections 420 and 34 IPC where no material shows involvement in creation
of false document or knowledge of defective title; revisional order set aside.
Court cannot issue writ
under Article 226 to direct Advocate General or Legislature to enact laws or
decide applications; vague and omnibus prayers rejected.
Account freezing order
modified to permit withdrawal of Rs. 50 lakhs where credited amount is
unrelated to alleged offence and lacks nexus with criminal proceeds.
Conviction under
Section 302 IPC upheld where accused used multiple weapons with premeditated
intent and child eyewitness account was reliable and corroborated by forensic
and CCTV evidence.
Conviction under Sec.
304 Part II proper-Act of setting victim on fire with knowledge of likely fatal
consequence does not attract Sec. 300 Clause 4.
Proceedings quashed
where allegations are vague, lack specifics of harassment, and appear
retaliatory; no offence under Sections 498A or 406 IPC made out.
Premeditated murder-Conviction
under Section 302 IPC upheld where murder was intentional, pre-planned, and
supported by direct evidence, extra-judicial confession, medical proof, and
weapon recovery.
Impugned order of conviction set aside, as prosecution failed to prove that Appellant was responsible for tampering with documents, as evidence indicated that mark-sheet and revaluation notification passed through multiple institutional hands before any alleged forgery was detected.
Reasons given for grant of bail to accused no.11 and reasons given for refusal to grant bail to accused no.20, is fully justified and reasonable.
High Court having rightly appreciated evidence as well as legal position, no any illegality in judgment of acquittal passed by High Court.
Circumstantial
evidence-Where prosecution failed to establish complete chain linking accused
to murder and recovery evidence was weak and uncorroborated, conviction under
Sections 302 and 397 IPC set aside.
Exception 4 to Section
300 IPC not attracted where accused deliberately set wife ablaze in presence of
sons; conviction under Section 302 IPC upheld based on eyewitness and dying
declarations.
Judgment of conviction passed by Trial Court stands restored, as prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt.
Quashing of FIR-FIR
quashed where valid civil transaction lacked fraudulent intent and mere deficit
in court fee did not attract forgery or cheating under IPC.
Both Trial Court and High Court made errors in convicting accused 1 due to a misreading of evidence, leading to conclusion that accused 1 is acquitted of all charges and must be released if not involved in other cases.
Recalling of witness-Application
under Section 311 CrPC allowed to facilitate fair cross-examination; earlier
rejection set aside subject to cost of 25,000.
Acceptance of C Summary
Report without judicial application of mind and solely on informants no
objection is improper; matter remanded for fresh consideration.
Tap the button below to open the PDF in your device's default viewer