Sentence modified from
10 years to 6 years in view of passage of 15 years since incident.
Accused entitled to
transcript of audio/video statement recorded during investigation for
cross-examination purposes.
Petition dismissed as
complainants remedy lies in pending civil suit where objections to alleged
forged agreement can be raised and expert evidence led; no infirmity in lower
court orders..
Conviction upheld as
victims consistent testimony was corroborated by her family and medical
evidence; delay in reporting explained.
Conviction set aside as
victims testimony was inconsistent, lacked medical support, and failed to meet
standard of credible and trustworthy evidence.
Conviction reversed as
victims testimony lacked medical and circumstantial corroboration, failed to
inspire confidence, and identification of accused was unreliable.
Conviction confirmed as
victims testimony was consistent and delay in lodging FIR due to social reasons
was satisfactorily explained in repeated sexual assault by relative.
Conviction set aside as
prosecution failed to prove victims minority and evidence revealed prolonged
consensual relationship, casting serious doubt on allegations of forcible
intercourse.
Conviction upheld as
DNA report was untainted and victims trustworthy testimony required no
corroboration.
FIR quashed as record
did not show false promise of marriage or deception, and complainants conduct
indicated willingness for mediation.
Cheque dishonour
complaint quashed as accused had no control over corporate debtors accounts
during insolvency resolution.
Proceedings quashed as
vicarious liability of company directors was not established and denial of
report rebuttal was prejudicial.
Allegations under POCSO
and IT Act against school staff found vague, with no direct evidence or CCTV
support; FIR quashed.
FIR quashed due to
prolonged delay in trial, absence of accuseds role in core offence, and gross
delay since investigation stage.
Detention under MPDA
Act quashed due to lack of public order element and unreasonable delay in
approval.
Zanmai has to regain control over its users' assets and provide assurance of their security thus, no reason to make an intervention, disturbing interim arrangement propounded by Arbitral Tribunal.
Detention order
invalidated due to delay in approval and failure to provide vernacular
translation of key documents.
Detention order set
aside due to contradictory grounds and denial of fair opportunity for
representation.
Detention under MPDA
quashed due to contradictory stand and malafide intention of sponsoring
authority.
Detention under MPDA
quashed due to non-supply of bail order and lack of proper material before
detaining authority.
Tap the button below to open the PDF in your device's default viewer