Detention set aside as
no cogent evidence existed to justify categorizing petitioner as dangerous
person; ordinary criminal law was sufficient.
Detention quashed as
there was no material to categorize petitioner as dangerous person or
bootlegger, and alleged acts only indicated law and order issue.
Detention order set
aside as solitary incident and in-camera statements failed to show disturbance
to public order warranting application of MPDA Act.
Detention order set
aside as absence of reference to subjective satisfaction and supporting
documents deprived petitioner of effective representation.
Detention upheld as
externment did not bar detention and live link existed between offences and
necessity of preventive action.
Quashed as authority
relied on stale offences and failed to demonstrate subjective satisfaction.
Upheld as detention
proposal, approval, and execution were timely and past offences were
sufficiently proximate.
Quashed due to
unexplained delay in proposal and issuance, indicating lack of urgency or
necessity for detention.
Tribunals decision to delay review is unjustified and stifles legitimate claim of Respondent no.1 but Court is not inclined to interfere with order in exercise of its writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution.
Denied as petitioner
had not completed the minimum sentence required under guidelines dated
15-3-2010.
Bail rejected due to
seriousness of offence, need for custodial interrogation, and risk of tampering
with evidence.
Bail granted where
custodial interrogation not required and allegations arose from domestic
discord.
Conviction of father
reversed due to medical doubts, family context, and failure to prove guilt
beyond reasonable doubt.
Conviction set aside
due to contradictions in testimony of victim and relatives, and DNA evidence
failed to connect accused to alleged sexual assault.
Conviction under POCSO
upheld but sentence reduced considering age and surrounding factors.
Inquiry into
disproportionate assets quashed as it continued despite departments denial of consent
and procedural violation.
State directed to
enforce decibel limits on religious loudspeakers; police to use mobile apps for
real-time sound measurement.
Prosecution under IPC
upheld despite prior action under Factories Act; role of manager found active
in negligent act.
Order dismissing
complaint for want of prosecution set aside as complainant had shown diligence
and matter had recently been fixed for evidence.
Proceedings under
Section 138 NI Act quashed as complaint lacked averments showing active
involvement of non-executive director in conduct of companys affairs.
Tap the button below to open the PDF in your device's default viewer