Modification of posting
without reason-Transfer order issued post election without justification
rightly interfered with by Tribunal.
Delay and laches-Employment
claim filed after unreasonable delay without pursuing remedies earlier is not
entertainable.
Employee transferred to
another division loses seniority in new division; prospective government
resolutions do not apply retrospectively.
There is no inherent
right to revaluation in selection processes unless specifically provided in
policy; minimum benchmark requirements are valid.
Unregistered and
insufficiently stamped partition deed cannot be relied upon as secondary
evidence.
Access to proper
washrooms is a fundamental right under Article 21, and all courts must ensure
hygienic facilities for judges, lawyers, litigants, and staff.
Plaintiff failed to
establish easementary right by prescription or necessity; concurrent findings
upheld.
Substantive rights
under eligibility certificate cannot be revoked without notice.
Discretionary pension
cannot be reviewed in absence of patent illegality under Section 114 and Order
XLVII of CPC.
When original purpose
for which land was taken by state ceases, religious institution has a right to
seek reversion of land under governing statute.
Recovery notices
attempting to re-open past closed claims under a policy circular are arbitrary
and violate principle of res judicata.
Bonafide need and
partial eviction-When only one legal heir desires eviction, partial eviction
decree is proper.
Charity Commissioner
can proceed under Section 41D even if change report is pending.
Denial of
regularization despite eligibility under Industrial Court judgment unjustified.
Right to claim a refund
crystallizes at time of execution of Cancellation Deed; subsequent amendments
to Stamp Act cannot retrospectively bar claim.
Penal compensation
disallowed; refund ordered with 9% interest.
Reopening settled
rebate claims barred by res judicata; no illegality in demand notice.
Absence of audit
objections or specific queries on rental income in assessment proceedings
prevents reopening of case under Section 147 of Income Tax Act.
A Look-Out Circular
issued without specifying clear reasons is liable to be quashed.
Disputes arising from
contractual obligations must be resolved under civil law unless clear criminal
intent is established.
Tap the button below to open the PDF in your device's default viewer